Skip to content

Partitioning and Sharding in DBMS

Modern databases store massive volumes of data that grow rapidly with time. Managing such large databases can become inefficient, affecting query performance, scalability, and availability. To overcome these challenges, database engineers use partitioning and sharding, both of which divide large datasets into smaller, more manageable units.

The principle is simple:

“A big problem can be solved efficiently when broken into smaller parts.”


Partitioning is a database optimization technique used to divide a large database table into smaller, manageable segments known as partitions. Each partition contains a subset of the table’s data and can be stored on separate disks or servers.

Despite partitioning, the table remains logically one single entity — SQL queries can access it as usual.

Instead of processing a giant table, queries now operate on smaller, partitioned tables, improving:

  • Performance
  • Manageability
  • Scalability

PurposeDescription
Performance OptimizationQueries scan fewer rows within a partition rather than the entire table.
Improved ManageabilityEasier to maintain and backup smaller data slices.
ParallelismMultiple partitions can be queried in parallel.
High AvailabilityEven if one partition/server fails, others continue to function.
Cost EfficiencyReduces the need for expensive hardware upgrades (scale-out instead of scale-up).

Partitioning can be implemented in two main ways:

  • Data is divided column-wise.
  • Each partition stores different columns of a table.
IDNameEmailSalary
1Akashakash@example.com60000

Vertical partitioning could split this into:

  • Partition 1: (ID, Name, Email)
  • Partition 2: (ID, Salary)

Pros:

  • Useful when applications frequently access only specific columns.
  • Reduces I/O load for partial data access.

Cons:

  • To reconstruct a full record, data from multiple partitions must be joined (higher latency).

  • Data is divided row-wise (tuple-wise).
  • Each partition contains different rows of the same table.
IDNameAgeCity
1Akash22Delhi
2Priya24Mumbai
3Raj25Chennai

Horizontal partitioning:

  • Partition 1 → Rows 1–1000
  • Partition 2 → Rows 1001–2000
  • Partition 3 → Rows 2001–3000

Pros:

  • Queries can be routed only to relevant partitions.
  • Ideal for distributed systems and scalability.

Cons:

  • Slight complexity in determining partition logic.

Partitioning becomes essential when:

  1. Dataset size grows enormously, making query performance slow.
  2. Server load increases, causing high response times.
  3. Backup, restore, or maintenance operations become cumbersome.
  4. Distributed or Cloud databases are used (requiring data segmentation).

AdvantageDescription
ParallelismQueries can run on multiple partitions simultaneously.
High AvailabilityFailure of one partition/server does not affect the entire system.
PerformanceQueries and indexes operate on smaller data subsets.
ManageabilityEasier to back up, migrate, or maintain data.
ScalabilitySupports distributed data storage without affecting structure.
Cost ReductionEnables horizontal scaling, avoiding costly hardware upgrades.

A distributed database is a single logical database stored across multiple physical locations (servers). Each site manages its data locally but is connected by a network and appears as a single unified system to the user.

Partitioning, Clustering, and Sharding are optimization techniques used to implement distributed databases.



Sharding is a specific implementation of horizontal partitioning across multiple servers or database instances. It involves splitting a large dataset into smaller subsets called shards, each hosted on a separate database instance.

A routing layer determines which shard contains the requested data.


A global e-commerce platform stores user data by region.

ShardRegionDatabase Server
Shard 1AsiaDB_Server_1
Shard 2EuropeDB_Server_2
Shard 3AmericaDB_Server_3

When a user from India logs in, the routing layer directs the query to Shard 1 (Asia), instead of searching all data globally.


  1. Sharding Key: A field (like user ID or region) determines which shard stores the data.
  2. Routing Layer: Routes queries to the appropriate shard using the key.
  3. Independent Shards: Each shard behaves as a separate database instance.

BenefitDescription
ScalabilityAllows horizontal scaling across multiple machines.
AvailabilityFailure in one shard does not affect others.
PerformanceQueries operate on smaller datasets.
Load DistributionDistributes data and workload evenly.

LimitationDescription
ComplexityRequires routing layer and consistent partition mapping.
Re-Sharding IssuesIf data grows unevenly, rebalancing shards is challenging.
Non-uniform Data DistributionMay cause load imbalance.
Scatter-Gather ProblemAnalytical queries need to fetch data from multiple shards, increasing latency.

9. Difference Between Partitioning and Sharding

Section titled “9. Difference Between Partitioning and Sharding”
AspectPartitioningSharding
DefinitionLogical division of a large table into smaller pieces within a single database.Physical division of data across multiple database instances.
Implementation ScopeWithin one DB server.Across multiple servers or databases.
Data DistributionLogical (can exist on same hardware).Physical (distributed across nodes).
Used ForPerformance and management optimization.Scalability and distributed storage.
Routing LayerNot required.Required to direct queries to shards.
Failure ImpactFailure affects the same DB instance.Isolated; failure of one shard doesn’t affect others.
ComplexityEasier to manage.More complex (requires mapping, balancing).
Best Suited ForLarge single-server databases.Distributed, cloud-scale applications.

-- Table Partition Example in MySQL
CREATE TABLE orders (
order_id INT,
order_date DATE,
customer_id INT
)
PARTITION BY RANGE (YEAR(order_date)) (
PARTITION p2022 VALUES LESS THAN (2023),
PARTITION p2023 VALUES LESS THAN (2024)
);

Divides data by year into multiple partitions within the same database.


// Pseudocode for sharding using userID
if (userID % 3 === 0)
connect(DB_Server_1);
else if (userID % 3 === 1)
connect(DB_Server_2);
else
connect(DB_Server_3);

Distributes user data across multiple databases (shards) based on user ID.


ConceptDefinitionExamplePurpose
PartitioningDivides a table into smaller segments within the same database.Year-wise orders partitionPerformance and manageability
ShardingDistributes database segments across multiple servers.Region-wise user dataScalability and load balancing
Vertical PartitioningSplit columns of a table.User info vs Salary dataOptimize column access
Horizontal PartitioningSplit rows of a table.Orders by regionOptimize data access by key

  • Partitioning enhances query performance and manageability within a single database.
  • Sharding ensures scalability and high availability across distributed systems.
  • Both are fundamental database optimization techniques in modern large-scale systems like Google, Amazon, and Netflix, where billions of records must be managed efficiently.